EnrichLayer Alternative: LinkFinder AI vs EnrichLayer

EnrichLayer is a capable developer-first enrichment API. But if you want natural-language lead search, flat per-request pricing, monthly billing, and an architecture that doesn't lean on LinkedIn accounts, here's an honest comparison.

Last updated: May 30, 2026

Start free — 25 credits Read the API docs

What EnrichLayer is — and where it's strong

EnrichLayer (enrichlayer.com) is a developer-first B2B enrichment API with a unified REST interface covering people, companies, jobs, and contact data. There's no point-and-click UI and no CRM workflows: you write code, or you don't use it. For indie developers and product teams who want cheap, raw enrichment at the API layer, that focus is a genuine strength, and the per-credit pricing is competitive at scale.

It's also fair to note where EnrichLayer came from. Its endpoint structure and credit model closely mirror Proxycurl — the LinkedIn data API that shut down in 2025 after a LinkedIn lawsuit — and EnrichLayer is widely described as a Proxycurl-style successor that stepped into the gap. We're not going to assert it's the exact same company, because that hasn't been publicly confirmed. What matters for your decision is the design it inherited and the trade-offs that come with it.

The short version: EnrichLayer wins on cheap raw per-credit cost at volume. LinkFinder AI wins on lead discovery (natural-language search vs. a few filters), pricing simplicity (1 credit = 1 request, monthly, no annual lock-in), and an architecture that doesn't depend on LinkedIn accounts.

LinkFinder AI vs EnrichLayer at a glance

A balanced side-by-side. EnrichLayer genuinely wins a couple of rows — this isn't a clean sweep.

Feature
LinkFinder AI
Best for most
EnrichLayer
Entry pricing
$29
per month
~$588 / year
(annual, ~$49/mo)
Billing
Monthly, no lock-in
Best rates require annual
Free to start
25 free credits
500 trial credits
Credit model
1 credit = 1 request (any endpoint)
1–3 credits + 3 / search result
Natural-language lead search
Search filters
Plain-English targeting
~3 company / 5 people filters
Uses LinkedIn accounts
No — zero ban risk
LinkedIn-data lineage
Web UI for non-developers
(API only)
Raw per-credit cost at high volume
Competitive
very cheap
Breadth of granular data points
Core B2B fields
extensive
Established third-party reviews
Trustpilot
Few / none yet

EnrichLayer pricing and feature details verified from public sources, May 2026. Always check enrichlayer.com for current numbers.

EnrichLayer pricing, and the real cost per record

EnrichLayer's plans are annual and credit-based, with pay-as-you-go also available. Here are the public 2026 tiers:

PlanCredits / yearPer creditAnnual cost
Starter~35,000~$0.0168~$588
Growth~350,000~$0.0103~$3,588
Pro~1,258,600~$0.0086~$10,788
Ultra~2,954,000~$0.0077~$22,788

The headline per-credit number understates real cost, because endpoints consume credits at different rates: a person profile is 1 credit, a company lookup 2, a work email 3, and search burns 3 credits per result returned. So a Starter-tier work-email lookup is closer to $0.05 than $0.0168 — still cheap, but not the sticker number. The 500 trial credits work out to roughly 166 email lookups: enough to test, not to run a campaign.

Two things to weigh. EnrichLayer's best rates require an annual commitment, and its default architecture is cache-first — you tend to get cached records unless you explicitly request a live pull at higher credit cost. If predictable monthly spend and fresh-on-demand data matter to you, that's worth factoring in.

LinkFinder AI keeps it flat: 1 credit = 1 request regardless of endpoint, billed monthly, with 25 free credits to start. See the pricing page for current plan limits.

EnrichLayer: honest pros and cons

Where EnrichLayer is strong

  • Very low per-credit cost, especially at high volume
  • Clean, unified REST API across people, companies, jobs, contacts
  • Extensive granular data points per record
  • Pay-as-you-go option alongside annual plans
  • Genuinely developer-first — minimal abstraction, you control everything

Where it falls short

  • Best pricing locked behind an annual commitment
  • Cache-first by default — freshness costs extra credits
  • Few search filters (≈3 company / 5 people) — weak for discovery
  • API-only — no UI for non-technical teammates
  • Little third-party review presence or published accuracy benchmarks yet
  • Built on the LinkedIn-data approach that drew legal action against Proxycurl

Which one fits you?

Stay with EnrichLayer if…

You're a developer who only needs cheap raw enrichment of profiles you already have, you're comfortable API-only, you can commit annually, and you don't need rich search filters or a UI for the rest of your team. At very high volume, EnrichLayer's per-credit economics are hard to beat.

Switch to LinkFinder AI if…

You want to find leads, not just enrich known ones — describing an audience in plain English and getting back matching profiles. You'd rather pay monthly than lock into a year. You want one predictable credit cost per request instead of doing per-endpoint credit math. You want non-developers to use a UI while developers use the same API. And you'd prefer an architecture that doesn't depend on LinkedIn accounts.

Why teams choose LinkFinder AI

The same enrichment jobs, plus the things an API-only credit tool leaves on the table.

Describe leads in plain English

The AI Lead Finder returns up to 100 matching profiles from a natural-language prompt — a different league from a handful of fixed filters. See the API docs.

Pricing you can predict

1 credit = 1 request on any endpoint, billed monthly, no annual lock-in. No per-endpoint credit math, no surprise overage at search time. 25 free credits to start.

No LinkedIn account needed

B2B Data Lookup pulls business-contact and company data without using your LinkedIn account — no ban risk on your side, and not the architecture that drew legal action against Proxycurl.

Moving over takes an afternoon

Both are REST + JSON, so migration is light. All LinkFinder requests go to a single endpoint with a type field selecting the enrichment:

curl -X POST "https://api.linkfinderai.com" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "type": "leads_finder_ai",
    "input_data": "VP Sales at B2B SaaS startup in the United States",
    "fetch_count": 50
  }'

Read status and result from the JSON response, handle 429 with exponential backoff, and you're done. Full reference in the API documentation.

EnrichLayer alternative FAQ

What is EnrichLayer?
EnrichLayer (enrichlayer.com) is a developer-first B2B enrichment API with a unified REST interface for people, companies, jobs, and contact data. It's API-only — no UI, no CRM workflows — and uses the same endpoint structure and credit pricing model Proxycurl popularized before Proxycurl shut down in 2025.
Is EnrichLayer the same as Proxycurl?
It's widely described as a Proxycurl-style successor and mirrors Proxycurl's endpoints and per-credit pricing. Whether it's run by the same company hasn't been publicly confirmed, so the accurate description is that it filled the gap Proxycurl left after its 2025 shutdown.
How much does EnrichLayer cost in 2026?
Annual, credit-based plans: Starter ~$588/yr (~35,000 credits, ~$0.0168/credit), scaling through Growth (~$3,588), Pro (~$10,788), and Ultra (~$22,788), plus 500 free trial credits. Because endpoints cost 1–3 credits (and search costs 3 per result), the effective cost per record runs higher than the headline rate.
What's a good alternative to EnrichLayer?
LinkFinder AI, if you want natural-language lead search instead of a few filters, flat 1-credit-per-request pricing, monthly billing instead of an annual commitment, and an architecture that doesn't rely on LinkedIn accounts. EnrichLayer stays reasonable for cheap raw per-credit profile enrichment at high volume.
Does EnrichLayer have a free plan?
It offers 500 free trial credits, not a permanent free tier; the cheapest paid plan is about $588/year. LinkFinder AI gives new accounts 25 free credits and bills monthly. See the pricing page.
How is LinkFinder AI's lead search different?
EnrichLayer's search is filter-based with a small number of filters. LinkFinder's AI Lead Finder takes a plain-English description (e.g. "Head of Marketing at e-commerce company in Europe, 50–200 employees") and returns up to 100 matching profiles per call, 1 credit each.
Does LinkFinder AI use my LinkedIn account?
No. B2B Data Lookup retrieves business-contact and company data without using or requiring your LinkedIn account, so there's no account-ban risk to you.
Is it hard to migrate from EnrichLayer?
No. Both are REST APIs that accept JSON. Point requests at https://api.linkfinderai.com, set the type field, pass your key as a Bearer token, and read status/result. Most integrations move in an afternoon — see the API documentation.

Try LinkFinder AI free

Get 25 free credits, describe the leads you want in plain English, and see the difference from filter-based enrichment — no annual commitment, no LinkedIn account required.

No credit card required • Monthly billing • REST + JSON